Pondering reproductions, copying, and forgeries tends to make one ponder basic questions about the value of art, doesn't it? If experts can not tell an authentic painting from a forgery, then what exactly are art buyers paying for? Is it status? Authenticity? Is it a look or a signature or a name? Or is it the participation in a unique and original vision that ownership provides?
Written in a first person narrative, the protagonist delves into details about forgery techniques, as she employs the famous art forger Han van Meegeren’s methods of painting. Van Meegeren used synthetic phenol formaldehyde resin dissolved in a spirit such as turpentine and/or an essential oil which would then be mixed with hand-ground powder pigments. This was then baked to change its chemical composition permanently, becoming insoluble in alcohol, or other common solvents. The results are described as so beautiful that I'm almost tempted to try it.
8 comments:
I just put it on my library list...I'm picking up Steve Martins book tonight! Excited to read both...thanks for the recommendations!
Kathryn, great - I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Another interesting book is Provenance: How a Con Man and a Forger Rewrote the History of Modern Art. The Gardner Heist - both the book and the documentary are very interesting. I think forgery and art-theft are both fascinating topics.
Hi Vickie, thanks, I'll check the book and documentary out. I'm fascinated too, especially in how they provoke questions about value.
Thanks for the reccomendation! I love books like that. The Gardiner Heist is also a fascinating read.
My pleasure, Anne. Thanks for mentioning The Gardiner Heist. It's now on my list.
When I first saw this, I thought I had already read it, but, even better, I have another book to read. Thanks!
My pleasure, Jean!
Post a Comment